भारतीय कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी का प्रकाशन पार्टी जीवन पाक्षिक वार्षिक मूल्य : 70 रुपये; त्रैवार्षिक : 200 रुपये; आजीवन 1200 रुपये पार्टी के सभी सदस्यों, शुभचिंतको से अनुरोध है कि पार्टी जीवन का सदस्य अवश्य बने संपादक: डॉक्टर गिरीश; कार्यकारी संपादक: प्रदीप तिवारी

About The Author

Communist Party of India, U.P. State Council

Get The Latest News

Sign up to receive latest news

फ़ॉलोअर

शनिवार, 22 जून 2013

नेताओं की अवांछित सुरक्षा समाप्त की जाये.

लखनऊ २२ जून २०१३. भारतीय कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी के राज्य सचिव मंडल ने उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार से मांग की है कि वह सत्ता पक्ष और विपक्ष के नेताओं को मिली सुरक्षा के सम्बन्ध में श्वेत पत्र जारी करे.
    यहाँ जारी एक प्रेस बयान में भाकपा के राज्य सचिव डॉ गिरीश ने कहा कि नेताओं की सुरक्षा के नाम पर जनता की गाढ़े पसीने की कमाई का भारी अपव्यय हो रहा है. आजकल लोग धन कमाने को राजनीति में आ रहे हैं और ज्यादा धन कमाने के लिए तमाम नाजायज कामों में लिप्त हैं. इसके लिए वे सरकारी सुरक्षा कवच का बेजा स्तेमाल करते हैं.
    इतना ही नहीं सुरक्षा कवच हासिल करने के लिए अपने ऊपर हमलों और धमकियों की तमाम फर्जी वारदातें कराते हैं और उसके आधार पर न्यायालय से सुरक्षा के लिए आदेश कराने में कामयाब हो जाते हैं. सत्ता पक्ष की लचर पैरवी के कारण भी यह सब आसानी से हो जाता है.
    यहाँ यह सवाल खड़ा होता है कि यदि वे जन सेवक अथवा जन नेता हैं तो उन्हें सुरक्षा की क्या ज़रुरत है?लेकिन वे माफियागीरी में लिप्त रहते हैं और इसी प्रतिद्वन्दिता में उन्हें सुरक्षा की चिंता लगी रहती है. डॉ गिरीश ने कहा कि भाकपा और वामपंथ के सभी नेता पूंजीपतियों, उद्योगपतियों, भ्रष्टाचारी नौकरशाही और माफियाओं से हमेशा संघर्ष करते हैं लेकिन इनमें से कोइ सुरक्षा लेकर नहीं चलता. सामान्य तौर पर जनता के हितों के लिए लड़ने वालों की रक्षा भी जनता करती है.
    डॉ गिरीश ने कहा कि अपने श्वेत पत्र में राज्य सरकार स्पष्ट करे कि किस नेता को किस्से खतरा है और क्यों? सुरक्षा पाने को गढ़े गए फर्जी मामलों की सच्चाई उजागर की जायेऔर फिर इस आधार पर सर्वोच्च न्यायालय से आदेश प्राप्त किया जाए कि ऐसे लोग अपनी सुरक्षा का खुद इंतजाम करें.


»»  read more

RESPONSE TO MINISTER OF PETROLEUM, MR. VEERAPPA MOlLY'S STATEMENT

Mr. Moily's statement is misleading and malicious. I request him to kindly identify the vested interest I am representing.

The point in question is that Mr. Jaipal Reddy had issued the order imposing penalty on RIL for deliberately reducing the production level. I t is amazing that he says that the file did not come to him. The matter was in the public domain. Everybody knew the penalty that had been imposed but the Minister who succeeds Mr. Jaipal Reddy does not know the matter. I t is a deliberate ignorance to shift the burden on to his officers. It is all well known that Reliance refused to pay penalty, asked for arbitration. Even two arbitrators had been appointed by both the parties. Even lawyers have been appointed by the Ministry of Petroleum. In fact, the two judges were involved in discussion to nominate the third. Such a long, long process that has taken place during the time of his predecessor cannot be unknown to him. Government is a continuing process. When a new Minister takes office he must know what his predecessor has done. Mr. Moily in an interview to Economic Times on 23rd January, 2013 had made a statement. To quote, "The Government is thinking to junk the arbitration and start direct negotiations." He further said that the government has a weak case in arbitration. If Minister speaks in this way, what is the message that goes to his officials? The most intriguing is that on the one hand he says that the file was not put up to him, on the other, he makes a public statement debunking arbitration. It is a case of cynical hypocrisy. Therefore, it is not a case of ignorance but a deliberate attempt to sabotage the process of realizing the penalty and undermining arbitration. The second question that arises is that why he has not given the notice for penalty for the year of 2012-13 when the production had further declined. In fact, if the calculation is correctly made, the penalty should have been 1.7 billion dollars.

Why he is closing his eyes to further sharp decline in the current year which is almost 19 per cent of the approved level of production.

In case of relinquishment of the area given to Reliance, the CAG asked for vacation of at least 50 per cent of the allotted area. The Director General of Hydrocarbon has submitted his report categorically stating that 83 per cent of the area should be surrendered. Why he has not taken any action so far. Why he is allowing Reliance to occupy 6000 sq. km area illegally.

In fact, the Minister in a statement published in a number of papers on 16th June, 2013 said that he will not be guided by technical advice but shall always favour production and investment. Here again he is speaking against relinquishment to favour the corporate raising the slogan of 'improving production and investment. '

All of us would welcome massive investment in the oil and gas sector to make India self-reliant but that cannot be at the cost of loot of national resources.

Therefore, the collusion of the Minister with the corporate is clear. He wants to condone the criminality of underproduction and consequent damage to the Indian economy and allow the corporate to grab 6000 sq. km in violation of the contract.

- GURUDAS DAS GUPTA,
MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

»»  read more
Share |

लोकप्रिय पोस्ट

कुल पेज दृश्य